The Rewrites!
May. 31st, 2011 11:26 pmDD posted about the New Millenium Editions that she's self-pubbing as ebooks. Go and read the post, but the bullet points are:
So?! What do we think? Shall we have a bitter old fan bitchfest?
- DD gets a lot of feedback from readers, which is reflected in sales, that the early four books are confusing, alienating, boring, or weird in their technology. "Readers" here means new readers, young readers, readers in the actual target market who are sort of essential.
- She wants to fix those pesky timeline issues.
- She wants to fix what she describes as "quality of writing issues", clunky bits, etc .
- If she does it herself and releases them now, she'll have solid new versions to give to the publishers if they ever do a reprint (possibly when #10 happens).
So?! What do we think? Shall we have a bitter old fan bitchfest?
no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 11:34 am (UTC)1. I'm not as violently opposed as I thought I was going to be; I found DD pretty convincing in her post and I do trust her. At the end of the day, if this is a sales issue, it's a sales issue, and I care more about sales and new readers than ... um, than the integrity of the original work. That sounds a little bad! More, then, that I don't think DD will or could make changes that affect the integrity of the original work, only perhaps some surface details.
2. On the other hand, although I know plenty of people find SYWTBAW clunky, it is prooooobably my favourite book. I mean, I think Deep Wizardry is a better book, and the most recent book is always my favourite, but dollar for dollar on re-reads, I think SYWTBAW wins by quite a bit. So ugh, I feel nervous about that.
3. I'm kind of torn about the timeline and chronology issues. On the one hand, it would be nice to know if Dairine was nine or eleven when she took the Oath. On the other hand ... I always kind of loved DD's attitude about settings and ages, and I loved how it sort of didn't make sense. I felt that the books had a transcendent spirit because of these, so that it was always now everywhere for Nita and Kit, that Nita is always in a library finding the Manual and Dairine is always somewhere on the other side of the Universe discovering what it means to be a mother and Kit is always grieving Ponch and Carmela is always frying aliens with an eggbeater --- always, right now. so their datedness never made them seem oldfashioned to me; perversely, they made them seem more immediate.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 11:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 12:37 pm (UTC)And I know everybody raves over Deep Wizardry, but my favorite is High Wizardry with SYW a close second, and while I'm glad she decided to continue the series, none of the later ones have ever come close even temporarily. I don't think she's going to mess it up, but I admit to being a little afraid that little things I really liked will go away.
Edit: That said, I can definitely understand wanting to fix continuity issues, and I can see how the ever-changing "now is the time of publication" timeline could throw people. While part of me wants to say that it's good to expose people to different ways of constructing a story/series, I can't say I'd want to insist on it against the author's wishes and against the interest of sales of an ongoing series. :P
no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 04:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 07:39 pm (UTC)This is pretty much my view on the whole thing. (I mean, it's not like this is going to be the Star Wars original trilogy DVD re-release where they cut in footage of Hayden Christensen as Darth Vader, or added new scenes willy nilly.) I firmly believe that if everyone read YW the world could be a better place, and I'm a supporter of anything that gets people closer to that goal! That said, if the "updates" do get issued as physical books and overtake the "original" editions, I will count my "originals" as even prouder possessions.
I know what you mean about loving SYWTBAW despite its clunkiness. It's also up there on my favorites list, but every time I try to get a new friend to start the series, they make it past there and stop (or don't even make it through).
On chronology: it gets frustrating after a while not knowing, like you say, but I love how you pinned the "timelessness" of this series. So true.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 12:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 01:52 pm (UTC)I wonder if she's going to alter Dairine's Star Wars love too, since it's unlikely that a kid born in the 21st century would have had SW sheets and been fixated on the original trilogy.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 02:26 pm (UTC)That would be... unfortunate.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 02:49 pm (UTC)Nah, Dairine could've grown up when the prequel trilogy was coming out and still use that as a gateway to being all enthusiastic about the original trilogy and having Yoda sheets and wanting to battle Vader. That doesn't seem far-fetched or in need of handwaving.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 03:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 03:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 04:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 11:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 02:55 pm (UTC)Mostly I am very excited because the timelines frequently make my head explode. I only really have two timeline issues -- Dairine giving her manual her date of birth complete with year, and the fact that I can't figure out whether all nine books have taken place over a year and change, or over a bit more than two. Other than that I do like that they always take place Now, but if DD's updating them, maybe she can iron out the timeline issues also.
...This, and I constantly go back and forth on which of the books is my favorite, but High Wizardry especially does have a very important place in my heart. I would therefore be extremely interested in seeing an update of Spot and the mobiles and all that good stuff.
I am not very good at being a bitter old fan. :)
no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 07:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 08:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-01 12:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-01 02:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-02 11:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 03:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 04:23 pm (UTC)I mean, for us long-time fans, the goofy timeline and dated technology is part of the charm of the series. But, for example, rereading SYWTBAW with a critical eye, I can see how it's clunky at times, especially compared to her more recent books. If she can put out a "revised for the new millennium" shiny new edition that will be interesting for us to read and bring her new fans and more sales, and make one of my absolute favorite series fun and relevant for new generations of kids, I am all about that.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 04:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 05:05 pm (UTC)And why must they always be Apple products? Are The Powers That Be really so hipsterly obsessed with Cupertino? The closed, restrictive Apple dev model doesn't seem very wizardly, much less the focus on surface appearance over direct access. Real wizards use a unix command prompt, obviously.
Grr, I guess I'm feeling curmudgeonly today. Damned kids! :)
no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 08:25 pm (UTC)I imagine the main reason is that DD is most familiar with Apple, and the old saying goes "write what you know"
no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 07:00 pm (UTC)No, no real problems here. Like other people have said, I trust DD. I don't feel like it's a problem, but if the people who haven't bought the books yet tend to, then the person who stands to make or lose money has a perfect right to make cosmetic changes.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 07:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-01 11:18 am (UTC)Potential "go" date for the events of SYWTBAW: Spring 2000. Discuss.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-01 07:41 pm (UTC)So, if I follow this correctly (thanks as always to Peter (http://web.archive.org/web/20060211135759/http://www.table76.demon.co.uk/YW/timeline.html); when is someone going to rehost that, by the way?):
- SYWTBAW: spring 2000 (March?) Nita is 13. Kit is 12. Dairine is 11.
- DW: early summer, 2000
- HW: late summer, 2000
- Kit has a summer birthday so at some point here turns 13. (After DW?)
- AWAb: late summer, 2001. Nita is 14. Kit is about to turn or has turned 14. Dairine is 12.
- Sometime before Dilemma: dinosaurs in Central Park and the events of TBONWM. (Possibly between HW and AWAb.)
- Dilemma: very early fall 2001. Nita is 14, Kit is 14, Dairine is 12 but about to turn 13. (Peter has a September date for this which I don't think works because I think if 9/11 happened in the middle Nita and Kit probably would notice, and I think if it was just before they would mention. Which means Nita has just found out her mom is going to die when 9/11 happens. That's really cheery. :()
- Nita's mom dies around Christmas 2001. Nita is 14, Kit is 14, Dairine is 13. (Wow, they're old.)
- AWAl: winter 2002, after Christmas. Nita is 14, Kit is 14, Dairine is 13.
- AWH: spring break, 2002. Harry discusses 9/11 with Tom (it seems like it's recent enough that AWAb must be 2001, not 2002). Nita is 14 about to turn 15, Kit is 14, Dairine is 14.
- W@W: also spring 2002. Same ages - Nita possibly turns 15 between the books. Darryl has a wizpod that is significantly shinier than iPods of that era. Spot is also a little fancier than might be expected. But that's OK. WIZARD TECHNOLOGY.
- WOM: early summer 2002. (Although there's a Julian date in there for 2007). Nita is 15, Kit is 14, Dairine is 13. Peter has a stated intention from DD for Kit to turn 15 in here, but I don't think that quite plays. But 14 and 15 is a pretty respectable dating age IMO.
Opinions, everybody? That looks pretty solid to me although it's only my guesses. ??
no subject
Date: 2011-06-02 10:06 pm (UTC)On the other hand, it felt as though there was not enough breathing room between DW and HW, and between HW and AWAb, if we interpreted it as all occurring in June and July of 2000 (which it would have to be, for the six weeks in Ireland to go as planned.) You turn around and *snap* Dairine's a wizard! Turn around and *snap* Nita's parents are freaking out!
All of which is to say, there are some important interpersonal developments that don't hang well with either the compressed or elongated timelines. I'd go with the one that doesn't have major events taking place during 9/11, because as you say, that would be a an unavoidable problem.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-02 03:28 pm (UTC)I will also say that when I was reading High Wizardry for the first time, back in 2001 or so, I found it very outdated. I was able to cope, but that was partially because I'd played around with computers like the one Dairine had when I was a kid. Most kids my age had never done something like that.